Evolution Is The Spontaneous Change Of The Heritable...

Response To Questions Name Institution Course Date Question 2 Evolution is the spontaneous change in the heritable traits of a biological population over many successive generations. Charles Darwin designed the scientific theory of evolution through natural selection. Evolution by natural selection was a process that was properly demonstrated by the observations. The observations reflected that more offspring are produced than those that end up surviving (Darwin, C., Wallace, A. 1958). One of the examples that Darwin used to demonstrate natural selection was the fossil layers. The fossil layers are formed in sedimentary rocks. The sedimentary rock is commonly formed in the depositing and pressing of sediments on top of each other. After a long time, the layers of sediments get deposited on top of every layer. The weight of the upper layers presses forming into rocks called sedimentary rocks. One critical thing that Darwin noticed was that fossils in the bottom layers are still different from the alive today. Therefore, he concluded that organisms have not been the same since the beginning of the earth and that they gradually changed to a more complex organism. It was, therefore, critical to note that as new species arise, others become extinct. Thus, we lookShow MoreRelatedBIOLOGY GRADE 11 NOTES Essay examples6702 Words   |  27 Pagesorganisms on Earth Identifies an organism by its genus and species (ex. Humans-homo sapiens) Developed by Linnaeus in the 18th century Identifying Species 3 methods: Morphology ïÆ'   Form and shape ïÆ'   It is simple but there are natural variations in population Biology ïÆ'   If species are able to have sex and produce viable offspring ïÆ'   It is widely used however cannot always be used due to geographic separation, asexual reproduction and extinction of fossils Phylogeny ïÆ'   Evolutionary relationships ïÆ'  

Strategic Review - Singapore Airlines - 1961 Words

Table of content: Summary Introduction I. Background of Singapore Airlines II. Strategy 1. What is Strategy? 2. The nature of Singapore Airlines Global Strategy 3. Mission and value of SIA III. Strategic analysis of the organization and its environment 1. PEST analysis 2. Strategic Capabilities 3. Strategic SWOT analysis IV. Future strategic aspects for SIA 1. Recommendation 2. Conclusion References Summary: In this report I examine the history of Singapore Airlines’ the report will then including the corporate strategy, strategic choice and analysis of the company’s external environment political, economic, social and technical environment (PEST analysis), strategic capabilities and the strength,†¦show more content†¦The politics has become more secure between the nations around the globe. This Secures the Airlines business and gives the Airline industry a possibility to enter a new market. On the other hand, this will growth substantially the competition that the control will lose the advantage, Singapore Airlines (SIA) can no longer be the only airline in Singapore. A political barrier for Singapore Airlines would be its proposal for a investment in Air India, dealing in demanding setback to the Indian government’s privatization. Also there may be some potential that the 11th of September terrorist attack may shape a huger will to liberalize the industry, particularly as a large market companies have an important influence and chance in a deregulated nature. Economic Environment: Businesses need to reflect the state-run of a dealing economy in the short and long-terms for example: interest rates, inflation, unemployment, outlook for the economic Gross Domestic Product (GDP), or lack of investment. This is especially real when scheduling for global marketing. The event from the 11th of September has influenced the flight security in the view of the customers. Each environmental problem together with the impact of increase of fuel this has an impact of the basic prices of flights or inShow MoreRelatedCase Study : The Workforce Management Program1587 Words   |  7 Pagessplit from Malaysian Air in 1972, Singapore Airlines (SIA) began an aggressive growth strategy focusing first and primarily on its aircraft. During the 70 s, the airline made some very bold moves in upgrading its fleet of aircraft. Some of the unique offerings that SIA invested in were to provide live musical entertainment on many of its flights. It also focused on comfort and offered sleeping amenities called slumberettes on some flights. Additionally, the airlines management pursued gourmet chefsRead MoreHealth Organization Case Study Research Essay1514 Words   |  7 PagesHarvard Business Review Online and Hoovers Company Records, found in the GCU Library, are useful sources. You may also find pertinent information on your organizations webpage. Review Singapore Airlines Case Study. Prepare a 1,000-1,250-word paper that focuses on the organization or network you have selected. Your essay should assess the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade, and include a strategic plan that addressesRead MoreMultinational Firms Are Inherently Regional Rather Than Global: An Analysis of the Airline Industry in Singapore5044 Words   |  20 PagesTransport in Singapore. Russell, E. (2007, 07, 06). Prying open ASEANs skies GlobalEDGE, Michigan State University, (2013). Singapore: Economy Singapore Airlines, (2013). Where We Fly. Singapore Airlines, (2013). About Singapore Airlines. Singapore Airlines, (2013). Where We Fly. Mutzabaugh, (2010, 12, 14). U.S., European airlines no longer worlds biggest, IATA says. Rugman, A.M. Cecilia, B. (2004). The Regional Nature of the Worlds Banking Sector, Management International Review,12 (3):Read MoreSingapore Airlines Report3463 Words   |  14 PagesIntroduction 1 2.Company background 1 3.Business Strategy 1 4.Stakeholder Analysis 3 5.Environmental and Organization Audit 5 6. Strategic positioning for SIA 8 7. An ability to think strategically for SIA 10 BCG’s growth / share matrix 11 8.Strategic plan for SIA 12 9.Conclusion 14 10.References 14 1.Introduction This report will outline Singapore Airlines (SIA) business’ environment to aid in its future strategy formulation and planning. Firstly, this report will analyze the businessRead MoreSingapore Airlines Operations Management1954 Words   |  8 PagesCRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF SINGAPORE AIRLINES 3 1.2.1 Product/Service Differentiation 3 1.2.2 Human Assets 4 1.2.3 Fleet management 5 1.2.4 Strategic Alliances/Partnerships 5 1.2.5 Superior Service 5 1.3 COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE STRATEGIES (PORTER’S) 6 1.4 ANSOFF’S PRODUCT/MARKET GRID 8 2.0 REFERENCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY 14 1.0 With reference to Operations Management only, discuss how SIA might develop in the future in order to remain competitive. 1.1 Introduction The airline industry is an exclusiveRead MoreCritical Review Report on Singapore Airlines2124 Words   |  9 PagesExecutive Summary After carefully undertook a critical review of the five papers which are written by Daniel Chan on the story of Singapore Airlines (SIA) and Singapore Girl, it has in fact bring us a lot of thought and the strategies which SIA has used which attain SIA becomes one of the world’s leading airlines company. While SIA is one of the world s leading carriers with an advanced fleet and it is internationally respected as the innovative market leader combining a quality product withRead MoreSingapore Airlines Organisational Design and Structure2535 Words   |  11 PagesAirways. In 1947, Malayan Airways operated services between Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh and Penang. During 1972, where Malaysia -Singapore Airline (MSA) split in two entities, name Malaysian Airline System and Singapore Airlines. Since then, SIA has emerged as one of the top international airlines in the industry (SingaporeAirlines, 2012). SIA was ranked 17th in Fortune magazine’s list of most admired companies in 2007, the only airline to make it in the top 50. The company also consistently receivesRead MoreQantas International: Analysis of the External Environment1999 Words   |  8 Pagesthose airlines that market full service international air travel, and the primary direct competitors identified in this market are Emirates and Singapore Airways. Indirect competition in the marketplace comes from low cost airlines, and the main competitor in this market is Virgin Australia, which is jointly owned by Air New Zealand, Singapore Airways. Market Analysis International passenger traffic to and from Australia in December 2103 was carried by forty-eight international airlines that wereRead MoreDemographic, Economic Technological Factors of Hr Planning for Airline Industry in Spore4005 Words   |  17 PagesIntroduction The airline industry is by itself plays a big part in the economy. It generates 31.9 million jobs globally. (The impact of the financial crisis on labour in the civil aviation industry) It involves transportations, catering, securities, logistics, etc. As it does not work as an industry by itself, HR planning comes to be an important task. The airline industry has generally seen success in the many aspects involved with it – service, tourism, innovations etc. Despite the terrorismRead MoreWhat Makes A Decent Organization Or Association?1686 Words   |  7 Pagesconcentrates on the article entitled, Singapore Airlines (SIA) by Wyckoff (1989). It would further examine the carrier s administration system, workforce, promoting battle, and administration quality. A focused workforce is one of the keys to surviving and flourishing in the current financial environment (Antoniu, 2010). In any aircraft, lodge groups are among the most vital individuals that make up the workforce. The administrators of the Singapore Airline (SIA) (Wyckoff, 1989) are mindful of

John Hick and Pluralism free essay sample

John Hick was born in 1922 in England to a middle class family. He developed an interest in philosophy and religion in his teens, being encouraged by his uncle, who was an author and teacher at  Manchester University. Hick initially pursued a  law degree  at  Hull University, but converted to  Evangelical Christianity  from the fundamentalist Christian beliefs with which he was raised, and decided to change his career and enrolled at the  University of Edinburgh  in 1941. During his studies, he became liable for military service in  World War II, but as a  conscientious objector  on moral grounds, enrolled in the  Friends Ambulance Unit. After the war, he returned to Edinburgh and became attracted to the philosophy of  Immanuel Kant, and began to question his fundamentalism. In 1948, he completed his MA dissertation, which formed the basis of his book  Faith and Knowledge (Peters). He went on to earn a Doctorate in Philosophy from  Oxford University  in 1950 and a Doctorate in Literature from Edinburgh in 1975. In 1953, he married Joan Hazel Bowers, and the couple had three children. After many years as a member of the United Reformed Church, in October 2009 he was accepted into membership of the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain. Hick has twice been the subject of heresy proceedings. In 1961-1962, when he was teaching at Princeton Theological Seminary, he sought, as a Presbyterian minister, to join the local Presbytery of New Brunswick. He was asked whether he took exception to anything in the Westminster Confession of 1647 and answered that several points were open to question; for example, he was agnostic on the historical truth of the Virgin Birth and did not regard it as an essential item of Christian faith. Because of this, some of the local ministers appealed against his reception into the Presbytery. Their appeal was sustained by the Synod. A year later, a counter-appeal was sustained by the Judicial Committee of the General Assembly, and Hick became a member of the Presbytery (Furlong). In the mid-1980s, when teaching at the  Claremont Graduate University  in California, Hick sought to join the local Presbytery of San Gabriel. His application was strongly opposed by certain local ministers. After long discussion, the relevant committee told him that his application would be extremely divisive and invited him to withdraw it, which he did (Furlong). John Hick is often cited as one of the most—if not simply the most—significant philosopher of religion in the twentieth century (Cramer). His contributions to this field have been so substantial that they easily spill immense implications over into related fields. Clearly, Hick’s work has such implications for theology. Hick challenges theologians to transform Christian Religion to address effectively the modern world, which is now undoubtedly pluralistic. He both criticizes what he considers outmoded Christian in light of recent developments in religious epistemology, while simultaneously suggesting new possibilities for the enrichment of Christian experience as religious experience. While some of these suggestions are certainly open to debate, it is nonetheless certain that Hick, like Columbus, has discovered the new world—a new pluralistic world—which all future theology must take into account (although it is clear that, despite this recent discovery, the Indians—though this time the  real  Indians—have long since beaten us here as well). In light of his Kantian influences, Hick claims that knowledge of the Real (his generic term for Transcendent Reality) can only be known as it is being perceived. For that reason, absolute truth claims about God (to use Christian language) are really truth claims about perceptions of God; that is, claims about the phenomenal God and not the noumenal God. Furthermore, because all knowledge is rooted in experience, which is then perceived and interpreted into human categories of conception, cultural and historical contexts that inevitably influence human perception are necessarily components of knowledge of the Real. This means that knowledge of God and religious truth claims pertaining thereof are culturally and historically influenced; and for that reason should not be considered absolute. This is a significant aspect of Hicks argument against Christian  exclusivism, which holds that although other religions might contain partial goodness and truth,  salvation  is provided only in  Jesus  Christ, and the complete truth of God is contained only in Christianity (Hick, Christ. Theo. ). Perhaps the simplest manner in which to understand Hicks theory of pluralism of religions is to share the comparison he makes between his own understanding of religion and the Copernican view of our solar system. Before Copernicus disseminated his views of the solar centered universe, the Ptolemaic system ruled in which the stars were painted in the sky, the earth was flat, and the sun rose and set around the earth. In short, the rest of the universe existed for and was centered on our little planet. On the other hand, Copernicus asserted that the earth and other planets as well, circled the sun, which in fact, did not move, but only appeared to move due to the revolution of our planet. Copernicus introduced our world to the understanding that other planets took similar paths around the sun; while each path differed, all served the same purpose and generated the same result: every planet makes a full path around our central star, and those revolutions create day and night for each planet, just as day and night occur on earth. Although the time frames for a full trip around the sun and for a full day-night cycle, differs on a planet-by-planet basis, the concept remains constant throughout our solar system (Hick, Christ. Theo. ). Similarly, Hick draws the metaphor that the Ptolemaic view of religion would be that Christianity is the only way to true salvation and knowledge of the one true God. Ptolemaic Christianity would assert that everything exists and all of history has played out in specific patterns for the glory of the Christian God, and there is no other possibility that will lead to salvation. Hick appears as Copernicus, offering the belief that perhaps all theistic religions are focused toward the one true God, and simply take different paths to achieve the same goal (Hick, God Univ. f Faith). A speaker on religious pluralism, Keith E. Johnson, compares Hicks pluralistic theology to a tale of three blind men attempting to describe an elephant, one touching the leg, the second touching the trunk, the third feeling the elephants side. Each man describes the elephant differently, and, although each is accurate, each is convinced of their own correctness and the mistakenness of the other two. Robert Sm id  states that Hick believes that the tenets of Christianity are no longer feasible in the present age, and must be effectively lowered'. Moreover, Mark Mann notes that Hick argues that there have been people throughout history who have been exemplars of the Real (Mann). Hicks position is â€Å"not an exclusively Christian inclusivism [like that of Karl Rahner and his ‘Anonymous Christian’], but a plurality of mutually inclusive inclusivism†Ã‚  (Hick, 23). Hick contends that the diverse religious expressions (religions) are the result of diverse historically and culturally influenced responses to diverse perceptions of the Real. He states that the different religious traditions, with heir complex internal differentiations, have developed to meet the needs of the range of mentalities expressed in the different human cultures. Criticism of Hicks theory comes from many places but in essence, they offer the same major critiques. A major concern is Hicks concept of the Real. If this is the center of the universe and also unknowable, are we not just worshipping an idol when we follow the path of Christi anity, Buddhism or Islam? Another issue is Hicks Christology in which he says that the incarnation is just a myth made up by the early Church and that Jesus is not divine in any way. I can see his point from a scientific standpoint and can agree to a point. Hicks hypothesis also does not take seriously the otherness of the major religions; how can monotheistic and polytheistic or primitive and highly developed religions all be lumped together? Although there is much within the religions that are similar, some things are contradictory and Hick does not give an adequate explanation for why these things are so if there is the same God behind it all. Although Hicks model is perhaps appealing to our post-modern sensibilities that wish to condemn no one, his theory still raises too many questions for many Christians to accept it in full. The person and work of Jesus Christ is central to the Christian faith and for Hick to devalue the divinity of Jesus so much is to perhaps move Christianity away from its very core. As such, Hick offers a view that can challenge our exclusive positions but that perhaps is not much use in our debate about religious pluralism. We live in a pluralistic world with regard to religious beliefs. This is all the more evident today with globalization and greater mobility of people and ideas. This raises the question of what is the relationship between the major world religions and more specifically how Christianity relates to the other major faiths. The traditional exclusivist position is not that helpful for our discussion because it is offensive and does not take seriously the goodness in the other religions. The pluralist position, while challenging is also not that helpful because it does not take the otherness of religions seriously and it also discounts the centrality of Christ. The inclusivist position, while far from perfect offers an alternative middle ground that affirms the centrality of Christ in salvation. This position also takes the other religions seriously and can serve as an appropriate model for which to base Christian interaction with the world. This interaction can take the form of hospitality, dialogue and mission from joy both at the micro and macro level.